NVIDIA RTX 5060

The NVIDIA RTX 5060 has 8 GB VRAM and 448 GB/s memory bandwidth. It can run 27 of our 99 tracked models natively in VRAM at 8k context.

With 8 GB GDDR7, the NVIDIA RTX 5060 is a consumer-tier GPU that can run 27 models natively. This site's calculator puts Qwen 2.5 7B at 43.4 tok/s at Q6_K (7.5 GB, fits natively) and Llama 3.1 8B at 49 tok/s at Q4_K_M (6.7 GB); Q6_K doesn't quite fit for the 8B model (8.56 GB, tips into offload), so Q4_K_M is the practical ceiling for 8B-class weights. Qwen2.5 14B doesn't fit natively even at Q3_K_M (9.7 GB total, spills into system RAM on this 8GB card); this is really a 7-8B-class GPU, not a 14B one. The 5th-gen Tensor Cores also run NVIDIA's native NVFP4 format, a 4-bit quantization scheme newer than the legacy GGUF K-quants, in hardware, and it's the fastest fit for both models this card actually handles: Qwen 2.5 7B reaches 68.2 tok/s at NVFP4 (4.78 GB) versus 43.4 tok/s at Q6_K, and Llama 3.1 8B reaches 57.4 tok/s at NVFP4 (5.68 GB) versus 49 tok/s at Q4_K_M. Those two NVFP4 figures are worth comparing against the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB, which shares this card's exact 448 GB/s bandwidth: this site's calculator returns the identical 68.2 tok/s for Qwen 2.5 7B and 57.4 tok/s for Llama 3.1 8B on both cards, bit-for-bit, since decode speed is bandwidth-bound and the two cards' memory subsystems are otherwise the same; the Ti's 16GB buys headroom for larger models, not a faster ceiling for the ones that already fit here.

The NVIDIA RTX 5060 is the entry-level Blackwell GPU with 8GB GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus (448 GB/s) and 3,840 CUDA cores. It is strictly a 1080p gaming card; for LLM inference, only small models like Gemma 4 E4B or Phi-4-mini fit comfortably in VRAM.

NVIDIA RTX 5060: Launched May 19, 2025 on the Blackwell GB206-250 die at a $299 MSRP, though real street prices ran $330-360 during launch week: $330 at Newegg, $360 in Taiwan. NVIDIA didn't seed review samples to press at all this time: GamersNexus bought its own two cards to run a delayed, self-funded review it titled "Forbidden Review," writing it would likely keep buying every future NVIDIA GPU it tests rather than depend on manufacturer samples, and calling the pattern "anti-consumer." The card itself: 3,840 CUDA cores, a 145W TDP, and PCIe 5.0 x8, half the lanes of a full x16 slot, a cut this card shares with the RTX 4060 before it, and one that costs little in practice on a Gen 4 or Gen 5 board.

This site's calculator puts Qwen 2.5 7B at 43.4 tok/s at Q6_K (7.5 GB, fits natively) and Llama 3.1 8B at 49 tok/s at Q4_K_M (6.7 GB); Q6_K doesn't quite fit for the 8B model (8.56 GB, tips into offload), so Q4_K_M is the practical ceiling for 8B-class weights. Qwen2.5 14B doesn't fit natively even at Q3_K_M (9.7 GB total, spills into system RAM on this 8GB card); this is really a 7-8B-class GPU, not a 14B one. The 5th-gen Tensor Cores also run NVIDIA's native NVFP4 format, a 4-bit quantization scheme newer than the legacy GGUF K-quants, in hardware, and it's the fastest fit for both models this card actually handles: Qwen 2.5 7B reaches 68.2 tok/s at NVFP4 (4.78 GB) versus 43.4 tok/s at Q6_K, and Llama 3.1 8B reaches 57.4 tok/s at NVFP4 (5.68 GB) versus 49 tok/s at Q4_K_M. Those two NVFP4 figures are worth comparing against the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB, which shares this card's exact 448 GB/s bandwidth: this site's calculator returns the identical 68.2 tok/s for Qwen 2.5 7B and 57.4 tok/s for Llama 3.1 8B on both cards, bit-for-bit, since decode speed is bandwidth-bound and the two cards' memory subsystems are otherwise the same; the Ti's 16GB buys headroom for larger models, not a faster ceiling for the ones that already fit here.

Compute capability 12.0 (sm_120) was genuinely new hardware at launch: stable PyTorch releases needed months to add sm_120 kernels (a GitHub issue tracking official support, pytorch/pytorch#159207, stayed open for months after this card's May 2025 launch), and NVIDIA's own engineering blog cites a ~27% LM Studio speedup after upgrading to the CUDA 12.8 runtime Blackwell requires. That gap has closed since launch, but a very old llama.cpp, Ollama, or PyTorch build may still not recognize this GPU's architecture. VRAM capacity is the bigger long-run constraint: this is the second straight generation at 8GB (the RTX 4060 was 8GB too), even as bandwidth jumped 64.7%; reviewers were near-unanimous that capacity, not compute, is what will limit this card first. It shares that same 448 GB/s ceiling with the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB one step up in the lineup, so the Ti's $429 MSRP buys double the VRAM on an identical memory subsystem rather than a faster one.

VendorNVIDIA
ArchitectureBlackwell
VRAM8 GB
Memory typeGDDR7
Memory bandwidth448 GB/s
Compute backendCUDA
TierConsumer
Released2025
Models (native)27 / 99
Models (offload)30 / 99
Software: Full llama.cpp and Ollama support out of the box. CUDA 12.x recommended; driver ≥ 525 required.

The floor of the current Blackwell stack

Plotting every desktop Blackwell GPU this site tracks by VRAM and bandwidth together shows where the RTX 5060 actually sits, and how little separates it from the next card up:

0950190001734VRAM (GB)Bandwidth (GB/s)NVIDIA RTX 5050NVIDIA RTX 5060NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16GBNVIDIA RTX 5070NVIDIA RTX 5070 TiNVIDIA RTX 5080NVIDIA RTX 5090
VRAM and memory bandwidth, from each card's real spec sheet. A card further right holds bigger models; a card further up decodes them faster once they fit.

The RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti 16GB share the exact same 448 GB/s; the Ti upgrade buys double the VRAM (16GB vs 8GB) and more CUDA cores, not a faster memory subsystem. Above that, VRAM and bandwidth climb together all the way to the RTX 5090's 32GB at 1,792 GB/s, four times this card's bandwidth. Only the RTX 5050 has less bandwidth than the RTX 5060 in the tracked Blackwell desktop lineup, and nothing in it has less VRAM.

Bandwidth jumped 65% generation over generation: VRAM didn't move at all

The RTX 4060 to RTX 5060 upgrade is unusual: one of these two numbers changed a lot, and the other didn't change even a little.

NVIDIA RTX 4060
272 GB/s
NVIDIA RTX 5060 (this page)
448 GB/s
NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
448 GB/s

The RTX 4060 and RTX 5060 both ship 8GB: Blackwell's entry tier is the second straight generation stuck at that capacity, a point nearly every launch review raised. Bandwidth is the real generational story: 272 GB/s to 448 GB/s is a 64.7% jump, GDDR6 to faster GDDR7 on the same 128-bit bus. For LLM inference that means a model that fit on the RTX 4060 decodes meaningfully faster on the RTX 5060, but a model that didn't fit still doesn't.

The 8GB→16GB cliff, on the identical 448 GB/s

The RTX 5060 Ti 16GB isn't a faster RTX 5060; it's the same GB206 memory subsystem at the exact same 448 GB/s, just with twice the VRAM. That makes this the cleanest capacity-only comparison on the whole site: 28 of the 96 models this site tracks with a standard quant ladder (29.2%) reach a fits verdict on the Ti's 16GB at their best quant but only reach an offload verdict on this card's 8GB, at that identical quant. Here's a representative slice spanning dense 14B-27B models and 20B-35B MoE models:

fits within NVIDIA RTX 5060's 8 GBoverflow that forces an offload verdict on NVIDIA RTX 5060the dashed line marks NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16GB's 16 GB ceiling.tok/s is NVIDIA RTX 5060 offloaded into system RAM → NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16GB fully in VRAM, same quant, this site's calculator default 8K context.

None of these ten models fit this card's 8GB at any quant: Phi-4 spills earliest at just 9.34 GB (NVFP4), and Qwen 3.6 27B needs 15.15 GB (Q3_K_M), nearly double this card's usable VRAM. The throughput cost of that spill varies by architecture: dense models fall hardest, from 17.9 tok/s offloaded to 34.9 tok/s fully in VRAM for Phi-4, and from 3.8 to 21.5 tok/s for Qwen 3.6 27B, while MoE models, which only read their active experts, still take a real hit but from a higher floor, Qwen 3.5 35B-A3B going from 12.9 tok/s offloaded to 73.2 tok/s fully in VRAM. What makes this pair unusual is what doesn't change: for any model that already fits both cards' VRAM, decode speed is identical, not just close; this site's calculator returns the same 68.2 tok/s for Qwen 2.5 7B at NVFP4 and the same 57.4 tok/s for Llama 3.1 8B at NVFP4 on both cards, because bandwidth, not capacity, sets decode speed, and these two cards share the exact same bandwidth. The Ti's extra $130 (per NVIDIA's $299 vs $429 MSRPs) buys a wider set of models that run at all, never a faster version of the ones that already do.

Popular models for this GPU

Models this GPU runs natively in VRAM (27)

Show 22 more

Models that fit with CPU offload (30)

These use system RAM for layers that don't fit in VRAM, so expect much slower inference.

Too large for this GPU (42)

Frequently asked questions

How much VRAM does the NVIDIA RTX 5060 have?
The NVIDIA RTX 5060 has 8 GB of GDDR7 with 448 GB/s memory bandwidth.
What is the NVIDIA RTX 5060 best for?
With 8 GB of VRAM, the NVIDIA RTX 5060 is best for running compact models (1B–8B) at low quantization, suitable for edge inference, prototyping, and lightweight tasks.
What LLMs can the NVIDIA RTX 5060 run locally?
The NVIDIA RTX 5060 can run 27 of the 99 open-weight models tracked by CanItRun natively in VRAM at 8k context. Top options include: Ornith 1.5 9B at NVFP4, Qwen 3.5 9B at NVFP4, Bonsai 27B at 1-bit (Q1_0).
Can the NVIDIA RTX 5060 run Gemma 4 31B?
The NVIDIA RTX 5060 can run Gemma 4 31B with CPU offload at NVFP4 quantization, but inference will be slower than native VRAM execution.
Can the NVIDIA RTX 5060 run Qwen 3.6 27B?
The NVIDIA RTX 5060 can run Qwen 3.6 27B with CPU offload at NVFP4 quantization, but inference will be slower than native VRAM execution.
Can the NVIDIA RTX 5060 run Qwen3 8B?
Yes. The NVIDIA RTX 5060 runs Qwen3 8B natively in VRAM at NVFP4 quantization, achieving approximately 55.9 tokens per second.