Qwen 3.6 27B vs Gemma 4 31B
Side-by-side VRAM requirements, benchmark scores, and GPU compatibility for local AI inference.
Quick verdict
Qwen 3.6 27B is more hardware-efficient — it needs 18.8 GB at Q4_K_M vs 23.2 GB for Gemma 4 31B, fitting on 85 GPUs natively.
VRAM at each quantization (8k context)
| Quant | Qwen 3.6 27B | Gemma 4 31B | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| FP32 | 122.8 GB | 142.5 GB | -14% |
| BF16 | 62.3 GB | 73.0 GB | -15% |
| FP16 | 62.3 GB | 73.0 GB | -15% |
| Q8_0 | 32.0 GB | 38.3 GB | -16% |
| Q6_K | 26.6 GB | 32.1 GB | -17% |
| Q5_K_M | 21.3 GB | 26.0 GB | -18% |
| Q4_K_M | 18.8 GB | 23.2 GB | -19% |
| Q3_K_M | 14.8 GB | 18.5 GB | -20% |
| Q2_K | 11.8 GB | 15.0 GB | -22% |
| NVFP4 | 16.9 GB | 21.0 GB | -19% |
Diff is Qwen 3.6 27B relative to Gemma 4 31B. Green = lower VRAM (fits more GPUs).
Model specifications
| Spec | Qwen 3.6 27B | Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| Org | Alibaba | |
| Parameters | 27B | 31B |
| Architecture | Dense | Dense |
| Context | 256k tokens | 250k tokens |
| Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 |
| Commercial | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-04-01 | 2026-04-02 |
| GPUs (native) | 85 / 107 | 75 / 107 |
Benchmark scores
| Benchmark | Qwen 3.6 27B | Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 86.2 | 85.2 |
Green = higher score (better). — = not yet available.
GPUs that run only Qwen 3.6 27B(10)
- Apple M5 (16GB)16 GB
- Apple M4 (16GB)16 GB
- Apple M3 Pro (18GB)18 GB
- Apple M3 (16GB)16 GB
- Apple M2 Pro (16GB)16 GB
- Apple M2 (16GB)16 GB
- Apple M1 Pro (16GB)16 GB
- Apple M1 (16GB)16 GB
- Intel Arc 140V (16GB)16 GB
- Intel Arc 130V (16GB)16 GB
GPUs that run only Gemma 4 31B(0)
Every GPU that runs Gemma 4 31B also runs Qwen 3.6 27B.
GPUs that run both natively(75)
- NVIDIA RTX 509032 GB
- NVIDIA RTX 508016 GB
- NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti16 GB
- NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16GB16 GB
- NVIDIA RTX 409024 GB
- NVIDIA RTX 408016 GB
- NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB16 GB
- NVIDIA RTX 309024 GB
- NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti24 GB
- NVIDIA H100 80GB80 GB
- NVIDIA A100 80GB80 GB
- NVIDIA A100 40GB40 GB
- +63 more GPUs run both
Which should you use?
Choose Qwen 3.6 27B if:
- • You have limited VRAM — it's a smaller model needing 18.8 GB vs 23.2 GB
- • Long context matters — it supports 256k tokens vs 250k
- • Benchmark quality matters — scores 86.2 vs 85.2 on MMLU-Pro
- • You need chain-of-thought reasoning
Choose Gemma 4 31B if:
- • You want maximum capability and have a 24 GB+ GPU
Frequently asked questions
- Which is better, Qwen 3.6 27B or Gemma 4 31B?
- Qwen 3.6 27B has 27B parameters vs 31B for Gemma 4 31B, so Gemma 4 31B is the larger model. Qwen 3.6 27B is more hardware-efficient, needing 18.8 GB at Q4_K_M vs 23.2 GB. Qwen 3.6 27B runs on more GPUs natively (85 vs 75). On MMLU-Pro, Qwen 3.6 27B scores higher (86.2 vs 85.2).
- How much VRAM does Qwen 3.6 27B need vs Gemma 4 31B?
- At Q4_K_M quantization with 8k context, Qwen 3.6 27B needs approximately 18.8 GB of VRAM, while Gemma 4 31B needs 23.2 GB. At FP16, Qwen 3.6 27B requires 62.3 GB vs 73.0 GB for Gemma 4 31B.
- Can you run Qwen 3.6 27B on the same GPUs as Gemma 4 31B?
- Yes, 75 GPUs can run both natively in VRAM, including NVIDIA RTX 5090, NVIDIA RTX 5080, NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti. However, 10 GPUs can run Qwen 3.6 27B but not Gemma 4 31B, and no GPU can run Gemma 4 31B without also fitting Qwen 3.6 27B.
- What is the difference between Qwen 3.6 27B and Gemma 4 31B?
- Qwen 3.6 27B has 27B parameters (dense) with a 256k context window. Gemma 4 31B has 31B parameters (dense) with a 250k context window.
- Which model fits in 24 GB of VRAM, Qwen 3.6 27B or Gemma 4 31B?
- Both fit in 24 GB of VRAM at Q4_K_M — Qwen 3.6 27B needs 18.8 GB and Gemma 4 31B needs 23.2 GB.