Gemma 4 31B vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Side-by-side VRAM requirements, benchmark scores, and GPU compatibility for local AI inference.
Quick verdict
Gemma 4 31B is more hardware-efficient — it needs 21.0 GB at Q4_K_M vs 42.2 GB for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, fitting on 50 GPUs natively.
VRAM at each quantization (8k context)
| Quant | Gemma 4 31B | Llama 3.3 70B Instruct | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| FP16 | 73.0 GB | 159.8 GB | -54% |
| Q8 | 38.3 GB | 81.4 GB | -53% |
| Q6_K | 29.6 GB | 61.8 GB | -52% |
| Q5_K_M | 25.3 GB | 52.0 GB | -51% |
| Q4_K_M | 21.0 GB | 42.2 GB | -50% |
| Q3_K_M | 17.5 GB | 34.4 GB | -49% |
| Q2_K | 14.0 GB | 26.5 GB | -47% |
Diff is Gemma 4 31B relative to Llama 3.3 70B Instruct. Green = lower VRAM (fits more GPUs).
Model specifications
| Spec | Gemma 4 31B | Llama 3.3 70B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Org | Meta | |
| Parameters | 31B | 70B |
| Architecture | Dense | Dense |
| Context | 250k tokens | 125k tokens |
| Modalities | text, vision | text |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Llama 3.3 Community |
| Commercial | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2024-12-06 |
| GPUs (native) | 50 / 67 | 38 / 67 |
GPUs that run only Gemma 4 31B(12)
- NVIDIA RTX 409024 GB
- NVIDIA RTX 408016 GB
- NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB16 GB
- NVIDIA RTX 309024 GB
- NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti24 GB
- AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX24 GB
- AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT20 GB
- AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT16 GB
- Apple M4 Pro (24GB)24 GB
- Apple M3 (24GB)24 GB
- +2 more
GPUs that run only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct(0)
Every GPU that runs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct also runs Gemma 4 31B.
GPUs that run both natively(38)
- NVIDIA RTX 509032 GB
- NVIDIA H100 80GB80 GB
- NVIDIA A100 80GB80 GB
- NVIDIA A100 40GB40 GB
- NVIDIA L40S48 GB
- NVIDIA RTX A600048 GB
- NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada48 GB
- NVIDIA DGX Spark (128GB)128 GB
- AMD Instinct MI300X192 GB
- AMD Strix Halo (128GB)128 GB
- AMD Strix Halo (96GB)96 GB
- AMD Strix Halo (64GB)64 GB
- +26 more GPUs run both
Which should you use?
Choose Gemma 4 31B if:
- • You have limited VRAM — it's a smaller model needing 21.0 GB vs 42.2 GB
- • Long context matters — it supports 250k tokens vs 125k
- • You need vision/image understanding
Choose Llama 3.3 70B Instruct if:
- • You want maximum capability and have a 43 GB+ GPU
Frequently asked questions
- Which is better, Gemma 4 31B or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
- Gemma 4 31B has 31B parameters vs 70B for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, so Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is the larger model. Gemma 4 31B is more hardware-efficient, needing 21.0 GB at Q4_K_M vs 42.2 GB. Gemma 4 31B runs on more GPUs natively (50 vs 38).
- How much VRAM does Gemma 4 31B need vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
- At Q4_K_M quantization with 8k context, Gemma 4 31B needs approximately 21.0 GB of VRAM, while Llama 3.3 70B Instruct needs 42.2 GB. At FP16, Gemma 4 31B requires 73.0 GB vs 159.8 GB for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.
- Can you run Gemma 4 31B on the same GPUs as Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
- Yes, 38 GPUs can run both natively in VRAM, including NVIDIA RTX 5090, NVIDIA H100 80GB, NVIDIA A100 80GB. However, 12 GPUs can run Gemma 4 31B but not Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, and no GPU can run Llama 3.3 70B Instruct without also fitting Gemma 4 31B.
- What is the difference between Gemma 4 31B and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
- Gemma 4 31B has 31B parameters (dense) with a 250k context window. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has 70B parameters (dense) with a 125k context window. Licensing differs: Gemma 4 31B is Apache 2.0 while Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is Llama 3.3 Community.
- Which model fits in 24 GB of VRAM, Gemma 4 31B or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
- Only Gemma 4 31B fits in 24 GB at Q4_K_M (21.0 GB). Llama 3.3 70B Instruct needs 42.2 GB, requiring a larger GPU.