Command-R 35B vs Qwen3 32B
Side-by-side VRAM requirements, benchmark scores, and GPU compatibility for local AI inference.
Quick verdict
Qwen3 32B is more hardware-efficient — it needs 22.2 GB at Q4_K_M vs 34.1 GB for Command-R 35B, fitting on 76 GPUs natively.
VRAM at each quantization (8k context)
| Quant | Command-R 35B | Qwen3 32B | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| FP32 | 168.8 GB | 148.4 GB | +14% |
| BF16 | 90.4 GB | 75.0 GB | +21% |
| FP16 | 90.4 GB | 75.0 GB | +21% |
| Q8_0 | 51.2 GB | 38.2 GB | +34% |
| Q6_K | 44.2 GB | 31.6 GB | +40% |
| Q5_K_M | 37.3 GB | 25.2 GB | +48% |
| Q4_K_M | 34.1 GB | 22.2 GB | +54% |
| Q3_K_M | 28.9 GB | 17.3 GB | +67% |
| Q2_K | 24.9 GB | 13.6 GB | +83% |
| NVFP4 | 31.6 GB | 19.9 GB | +59% |
Diff is Command-R 35B relative to Qwen3 32B. Green = lower VRAM (fits more GPUs).
Model specifications
| Spec | Command-R 35B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Org | Cohere | Alibaba |
| Parameters | 35B | 32.8B |
| Architecture | Dense | Dense |
| Context | 125k tokens | 128k tokens |
| Modalities | text | text |
| License | CC-BY-NC 4.0 | Apache 2.0 |
| Commercial | No | Yes |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2025-04-29 |
| GPUs (native) | 54 / 107 | 76 / 107 |
Benchmark scores
Green = higher score (better). — = not yet available.
GPUs that run only Command-R 35B(0)
Every GPU that runs Command-R 35B also runs Qwen3 32B.
GPUs that run only Qwen3 32B(22)
- NVIDIA RTX 508016 GB
- NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti16 GB
- NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16GB16 GB
- NVIDIA RTX 409024 GB
- NVIDIA RTX 408016 GB
- NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB16 GB
- NVIDIA RTX 309024 GB
- NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti24 GB
- NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada20 GB
- NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada24 GB
- +12 more
GPUs that run both natively(54)
- NVIDIA RTX 509032 GB
- NVIDIA H100 80GB80 GB
- NVIDIA A100 80GB80 GB
- NVIDIA A100 40GB40 GB
- NVIDIA L40S48 GB
- NVIDIA RTX A600048 GB
- NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada32 GB
- NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada48 GB
- NVIDIA RTX Pro 600096 GB
- NVIDIA DGX Spark (128GB)128 GB
- AMD Radeon PRO W780032 GB
- AMD Radeon PRO W790048 GB
- +42 more GPUs run both
Which should you use?
Choose Command-R 35B if:
- • You want maximum capability and have a 35 GB+ GPU
Choose Qwen3 32B if:
- • You have limited VRAM — it's a smaller model needing 22.2 GB vs 34.1 GB
- • Long context matters — it supports 128k tokens vs 125k
- • You need commercial use rights
- • Benchmark quality matters — scores 65.5 vs 33.0 on MMLU-Pro
- • You need chain-of-thought reasoning
Frequently asked questions
- Which is better, Command-R 35B or Qwen3 32B?
- Command-R 35B has 35B parameters vs 32.8B for Qwen3 32B, so Command-R 35B is the larger model. Qwen3 32B is more hardware-efficient, needing 22.2 GB at Q4_K_M vs 34.1 GB. Qwen3 32B runs on more GPUs natively (76 vs 54). On MMLU-Pro, Qwen3 32B scores higher (65.5 vs 33.0).
- How much VRAM does Command-R 35B need vs Qwen3 32B?
- At Q4_K_M quantization with 8k context, Command-R 35B needs approximately 34.1 GB of VRAM, while Qwen3 32B needs 22.2 GB. At FP16, Command-R 35B requires 90.4 GB vs 75.0 GB for Qwen3 32B.
- Can you run Command-R 35B on the same GPUs as Qwen3 32B?
- Yes, 54 GPUs can run both natively in VRAM, including NVIDIA RTX 5090, NVIDIA H100 80GB, NVIDIA A100 80GB. However, no GPU can run Command-R 35B without also fitting Qwen3 32B, and 22 GPUs can run Qwen3 32B but not Command-R 35B.
- What is the difference between Command-R 35B and Qwen3 32B?
- Command-R 35B has 35B parameters (dense) with a 125k context window. Qwen3 32B has 32.8B parameters (dense) with a 128k context window. Licensing differs: Command-R 35B is CC-BY-NC 4.0 while Qwen3 32B is Apache 2.0.
- Which model fits in 24 GB of VRAM, Command-R 35B or Qwen3 32B?
- Only Qwen3 32B fits in 24 GB at Q4_K_M (22.2 GB). Command-R 35B needs 34.1 GB, requiring a larger GPU.