AMD Strix Halo (96GB) vs Apple M4 Max (96GB)
Side-by-side local AI comparison — VRAM, memory bandwidth, model compatibility, and estimated tokens per second across 70 open-weight models.
Quick verdict
Apple M4 Max (96GB) wins for local AI inference. It has 113% more memory bandwidth, runs 57 models natively (vs 57), and exclusively fits 0 models the other cannot. Note: AMD Strix Halo (96GB) uses VULKAN while Apple M4 Max (96GB) uses METAL — software ecosystem matters for your framework.
Specs comparison
| Spec | AMD Strix Halo (96GB) | Apple M4 Max (96GB) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 96 GB unified | 96 GB unified |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 546 GB/s(+113%) |
| CPU cores | — | 16 (12P + 4E) |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Apple M4 Max |
| Backend | VULKAN | METAL |
| Tier | Laptop | Laptop |
| Released | 2025 | 2024 |
| Models (native) | 57 | 57 |
Estimated tokens per second
Computed from memory bandwidth and model active-parameter weight. Assumes model fits natively in VRAM.
| Model | AMD Strix Halo (96GB) | Apple M4 Max (96GB) | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.3 70B Instruct(70B) | 3.7 t/s(Q8) | 7.8 t/s(Q8) | -53% |
| Qwen 3.6 27B(27B) | 4.7 t/s(FP16) | 10.1 t/s(FP16) | -53% |
| Llama 3.1 8B Instruct(8B) | 16 t/s(FP16) | 34.1 t/s(FP16) | -53% |
| Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct(7.6B) | 16.8 t/s(FP16) | 35.9 t/s(FP16) | -53% |
Delta is AMD Strix Halo (96GB) relative to Apple M4 Max (96GB).
Only AMD Strix Halo (96GB) can run(0)
No exclusive models — Apple M4 Max (96GB) can run everything AMD Strix Halo (96GB) can.
Only Apple M4 Max (96GB) can run(0)
No exclusive models — AMD Strix Halo (96GB) can run everything Apple M4 Max (96GB) can.
Both run natively(57)
These models fit in VRAM on both GPUs. Bandwidth determines which runs them faster.
- Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE)42.7 t/svs91 t/s
- MiniMax M2.5 229B93.9 t/svs200.2 t/s
- MiniMax M2.7 229B93.9 t/svs200.2 t/s
- Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.114.4 t/svs30.8 t/s
- Qwen 3.5 122B-A10B (MoE)45.1 t/svs96.1 t/s
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B37.5 t/svs80.1 t/s
- GPT-OSS 120B90.1 t/svs192.2 t/s
- Llama 4 Scout 109B26.5 t/svs56.5 t/s
- GLM-4.5 Air 106B31.3 t/svs66.7 t/s
- GLM-4.6V 106B31.3 t/svs66.7 t/s
- Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct3.6 t/svs7.6 t/s
- Llama 3.3 70B Instruct3.7 t/svs7.8 t/s
- DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B3.7 t/svs7.8 t/s
- Llama 3.1 70B Instruct3.7 t/svs7.8 t/s
- Mixtral 8x7B Instruct v0.121.8 t/svs46.6 t/s
- Command-R 35B3.7 t/svs7.8 t/s
- +41 more on both
Which should you choose?
- • You want the newer architecture and longer driver support lifecycle
- • Faster token generation is the priority
- • You're on macOS and want native Metal acceleration (MLX, llama.cpp)
Frequently asked questions
- Which is better for local AI, the AMD Strix Halo (96GB) or Apple M4 Max (96GB)?
- For local AI inference, the Apple M4 Max (96GB) has the edge. It offers 96 GB VRAM (vs 96 GB) and 546 GB/s bandwidth (vs 256 GB/s), letting it run 57 models natively in VRAM vs 57 for its rival.
- How much VRAM does the AMD Strix Halo (96GB) have vs the Apple M4 Max (96GB)?
- The AMD Strix Halo (96GB) has 96 GB of LPDDR5X at 256 GB/s. The Apple M4 Max (96GB) has 96 GB of LPDDR5X at 546 GB/s. Both GPUs have the same VRAM amount; bandwidth determines which generates tokens faster.
- Can the AMD Strix Halo (96GB) run Llama 3.3 70B?
- Yes. The AMD Strix Halo (96GB) runs Llama 3.3 70B natively at Q8 quantization at approximately 3.7 tokens per second.
- Can the Apple M4 Max (96GB) run Llama 3.3 70B?
- Yes. The Apple M4 Max (96GB) runs Llama 3.3 70B natively at Q8 quantization at approximately 7.8 tokens per second.
- What is the difference between the AMD Strix Halo (96GB) and Apple M4 Max (96GB) for AI?
- The key difference for AI inference is VRAM and memory bandwidth. The AMD Strix Halo (96GB) has 96 GB VRAM at 256 GB/s (VULKAN backend). The Apple M4 Max (96GB) has 96 GB VRAM at 546 GB/s (METAL backend). VRAM determines which models fit; bandwidth determines tokens per second. The AMD Strix Halo (96GB) runs 57 models natively vs 57 for the Apple M4 Max (96GB).