Intel Arc A770 16GB vs NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Side-by-side local AI comparison — VRAM, memory bandwidth, model compatibility, and estimated tokens per second across 70 open-weight models.
Quick verdict
Intel Arc A770 16GB wins for local AI inference. It has 94% more memory bandwidth, runs 41 models natively (vs 41), and exclusively fits 0 models the other cannot. Note: Intel Arc A770 16GB uses VULKAN while NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB uses CUDA — software ecosystem matters for your framework.
Specs comparison
| Spec | Intel Arc A770 16GB | NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bandwidth | 560 GB/s(+94%) | 288 GB/s |
| Architecture | Xe-HPG (Alchemist) | Ada Lovelace |
| Backend | VULKAN | CUDA |
| Tier | Consumer | Consumer |
| Released | 2022 | 2023 |
| Models (native) | 41 | 41 |
Estimated tokens per second
Computed from memory bandwidth and model active-parameter weight. Assumes model fits natively in VRAM.
| Model | Intel Arc A770 16GB | NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.3 70B Instruct(70B) | — | — | — |
| Qwen 3.6 27B(27B) | 51.9 t/s(Q3_K_M) | 26.7 t/s(Q3_K_M) | +94% |
| Llama 3.1 8B Instruct(8B) | 70 t/s(Q8) | 36 t/s(Q8) | +94% |
| Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct(7.6B) | 73.7 t/s(Q8) | 37.9 t/s(Q8) | +94% |
Delta is Intel Arc A770 16GB relative to NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB.
Only Intel Arc A770 16GB can run(0)
No exclusive models — NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB can run everything Intel Arc A770 16GB can.
Only NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB can run(0)
No exclusive models — Intel Arc A770 16GB can run everything NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB can.
Both run natively(41)
These models fit in VRAM on both GPUs. Bandwidth determines which runs them faster.
- Qwen 3.5 35B-A3B (MoE)684.4 t/svs352 t/s
- Qwen 3.6 35B53.3 t/svs27.4 t/s
- Yi 1.5 34B Chat54.3 t/svs27.9 t/s
- Qwen3 32B56.9 t/svs29.3 t/s
- Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct57.4 t/svs29.5 t/s
- Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct57.4 t/svs29.5 t/s
- DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B57.4 t/svs29.5 t/s
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B513.3 t/svs264 t/s
- Gemma 4 31B60.2 t/svs31 t/s
- Qwen3 30B-A3B (MoE)513.3 t/svs264 t/s
- Gemma 2 27B Instruct68.6 t/svs35.3 t/s
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct51.9 t/svs26.7 t/s
- Qwen 3.6 27B51.9 t/svs26.7 t/s
- Gemma 4 26B (MoE)405.3 t/svs208.4 t/s
- Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct46.7 t/svs24 t/s
- Mistral Small 22B50.5 t/svs25.9 t/s
- +25 more on both
Which should you choose?
- • Faster token generation is the priority
- • You rely on CUDA-based tools (PyTorch, vLLM, Ollama)
- • You want the newer architecture and longer driver support lifecycle
Frequently asked questions
- Which is better for local AI, the Intel Arc A770 16GB or NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB?
- For local AI inference, the Intel Arc A770 16GB has the edge. It offers 16 GB VRAM (vs 16 GB) and 560 GB/s bandwidth (vs 288 GB/s), letting it run 41 models natively in VRAM vs 41 for its rival.
- How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A770 16GB have vs the NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB?
- The Intel Arc A770 16GB has 16 GB of GDDR6 at 560 GB/s. The NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has 16 GB of GDDR6 at 288 GB/s. Both GPUs have the same VRAM amount; bandwidth determines which generates tokens faster.
- Can the Intel Arc A770 16GB run Llama 3.3 70B?
- The Intel Arc A770 16GB can run Llama 3.3 70B with CPU offload at Q3_K_M, but at reduced speed.
- Can the NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB run Llama 3.3 70B?
- The NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB can run Llama 3.3 70B with CPU offload at Q3_K_M, but at reduced speed.
- What is the difference between the Intel Arc A770 16GB and NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB for AI?
- The key difference for AI inference is VRAM and memory bandwidth. The Intel Arc A770 16GB has 16 GB VRAM at 560 GB/s (VULKAN backend). The NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has 16 GB VRAM at 288 GB/s (CUDA backend). VRAM determines which models fit; bandwidth determines tokens per second. The Intel Arc A770 16GB runs 41 models natively vs 41 for the NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB.