Intel Arc A770 16GB vs NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Side-by-side local AI comparison: VRAM, memory bandwidth, model compatibility, and estimated tokens per second across 97 open-weight models.
Quick verdict
Intel Arc A770 16GB is faster for local AI inference, but only on memory bandwidth (94.4% more). Both GPUs have 16 GB VRAM and run the exact same 45 models natively — neither fits anything the other can't. Note: Intel Arc A770 16GB uses VULKAN while NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB uses CUDA; software ecosystem matters for your framework.
Specs comparison
| Spec | Intel Arc A770 16GB | NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bandwidth | 560 GB/s(+94%) | 288 GB/s |
| Architecture | Xe-HPG (Alchemist) | Ada Lovelace |
| Backend | VULKAN | CUDA |
| Tier | Consumer | Consumer |
| Released | 2022 | 2023 |
| Models (native) | 45 | 45 |
Estimated tokens per second
Computed from memory bandwidth and model active-parameter weight. Assumes model fits natively in VRAM.
| Model | Intel Arc A770 16GB | NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.3 70B Instruct(70B) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Qwen 3.6 27B(27B) | 26.9 t/s(Q3_K_M) | 13.8 t/s(Q3_K_M) | +95% |
| Llama 3.1 8B Instruct(8B) | 38 t/s(Q8_0) | 19.5 t/s(Q8_0) | +95% |
| Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct(7.6B) | 42.6 t/s(Q8_0) | 21.9 t/s(Q8_0) | +95% |
Delta is Intel Arc A770 16GB relative to NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB.
Only Intel Arc A770 16GB can run(0)
No exclusive models: NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB can run everything Intel Arc A770 16GB can.
Only NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB can run(0)
No exclusive models: Intel Arc A770 16GB can run everything NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB can.
Both run natively(45)
These models fit in VRAM on both GPUs. Bandwidth determines which runs them faster.
- Qwen 3.5 35B-A3B (MoE)91.5 t/svs47.1 t/s
- Ornith 1.5 35B-A3B (MoE)91.5 t/svs47.1 t/s
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B85.7 t/svs44.1 t/s
- Gemma 4 31B27.6 t/svs14.2 t/s
- Qwen3 30B-A3B (MoE)78.9 t/svs40.6 t/s
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B94.3 t/svs48.5 t/s
- Muse Glimmer 30B26.8 t/svs13.8 t/s
- Gemma 2 27B Instruct27.1 t/svs13.9 t/s
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct30.8 t/svs15.8 t/s
- Qwen 3.6 27B26.9 t/svs13.8 t/s
- UI-Mate 27B26.9 t/svs13.8 t/s
- Bonsai 27B41.3 t/svs21.2 t/s
- Qwen 3.8 27B26.9 t/svs13.8 t/s
- Gemma 4 26B (MoE)56.3 t/svs28.9 t/s
- Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct28.2 t/svs14.5 t/s
- Mistral Small 22B29 t/svs14.9 t/s
- +29 more on both
Which should you choose?
- • Faster token generation is the priority
- • You rely on CUDA-based tools (PyTorch, vLLM, Ollama)
- • You want the newer architecture and longer driver support lifecycle
Frequently asked questions
- Which is better for local AI, the Intel Arc A770 16GB or NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB?
- For local AI inference, the Intel Arc A770 16GB has the edge. It offers 16 GB VRAM (vs 16 GB) and 560 GB/s bandwidth (vs 288 GB/s), letting it run 45 models natively in VRAM vs 45 for its rival.
- How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A770 16GB have vs the NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB?
- The Intel Arc A770 16GB has 16 GB of GDDR6 at 560 GB/s. The NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has 16 GB of GDDR6 at 288 GB/s. Both GPUs have the same VRAM amount; bandwidth determines which generates tokens faster.
- Can the Intel Arc A770 16GB run Llama 3.3 70B?
- The Intel Arc A770 16GB can run Llama 3.3 70B with CPU offload at Q3_K_M, but at reduced speed.
- Can the NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB run Llama 3.3 70B?
- The NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB can run Llama 3.3 70B with CPU offload at Q3_K_M, but at reduced speed.
- What is the difference between the Intel Arc A770 16GB and NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB for AI?
- The key difference for AI inference is VRAM and memory bandwidth. The Intel Arc A770 16GB has 16 GB VRAM at 560 GB/s (VULKAN backend). The NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has 16 GB VRAM at 288 GB/s (CUDA backend). VRAM determines which models fit; bandwidth determines tokens per second. The Intel Arc A770 16GB runs 45 models natively vs 45 for the NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16GB.