NVIDIA A100 40GB vs NVIDIA A100 80GB
Side-by-side local AI comparison — VRAM, memory bandwidth, model compatibility, and estimated tokens per second across 85 open-weight models.
Quick verdict
NVIDIA A100 80GB wins for local AI inference. It has 40 GB more VRAM and 31% more memory bandwidth, runs 59 models natively (vs 51), and exclusively fits 8 models the other cannot.
Analysis
The NVIDIA A100 40GB and 80GB are the same GA100 die in two different memory configurations, not a generational upgrade — a straight capacity-and-bandwidth choice within the same Ampere-era card. The 40GB ships with older HBM2; the 80GB variant uses newer HBM2e, so upgrading isn't just about doubling VRAM.
Doubling capacity from 40GB to 80GB also buys a real bandwidth jump: 1,555 GB/s to 2,039 GB/s, a 31% gain purely from the HBM2-to-HBM2e memory switch, with no change to the compute silicon underneath. That compounds directly into decode speed — this site's calculator measures Llama 3.1 8B at Q4_K_M running 170.0 tok/s on the 40GB card versus 222.9 tok/s on the 80GB card, tracking the bandwidth gap almost exactly. Capacity is where the functional difference really shows up: the 40GB card only fits Llama 3.3 70B at the most aggressive Q2_K (32.88 GB, 34.4 tok/s), while the 80GB card reaches all the way up to Q6_K (67.37 GB, 22.0 tok/s) — four rungs higher on the quantization ladder for meaningfully better output quality. Across the 85 tracked models, the 80GB card runs 59 natively versus the 40GB card's 51.
Bottom line: If your budget allows it, the 80GB card is the better buy outright — more capacity, more bandwidth, and no compute-architecture tradeoff to weigh, since it's the identical GA100 die underneath. The 40GB card earns its keep on price: it's the cheaper way into genuine HBM-class datacenter hardware, and it's comfortable for 7B-14B models at high quantization or 32B models at Q4-Q6 — workloads that never needed the 80GB ceiling in the first place. Only step up to the 80GB card if 70B-class models at higher quantization, or running several mid-size models loaded simultaneously, are actually part of your workload.
Specs comparison
| Spec | NVIDIA A100 40GB | NVIDIA A100 80GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 40 GB | 80 GB |
| Memory type | HBM2 | HBM2e |
| Bandwidth | 1555 GB/s | 2039 GB/s(+31%) |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Backend | CUDA | CUDA |
| Tier | Datacenter | Datacenter |
| Released | 2020 | 2020 |
| Models (native) | 51 | 59 |
Estimated tokens per second
Computed from memory bandwidth and model active-parameter weight. Assumes model fits natively in VRAM.
| Model | NVIDIA A100 40GB | NVIDIA A100 80GB | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.3 70B Instruct(70B) | 34.4 t/s(Q2_K) | 22 t/s(Q6_K) | +56% |
| Qwen 3.6 27B(27B) | 34.6 t/s(Q8_0) | 24.3 t/s(BF16) | +42% |
| Llama 3.1 8B Instruct(8B) | 30.6 t/s(FP32) | 40.1 t/s(FP32) | -24% |
| Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct(7.6B) | 32.7 t/s(FP32) | 42.9 t/s(FP32) | -24% |
Delta is NVIDIA A100 40GB relative to NVIDIA A100 80GB.
Only NVIDIA A100 40GB can run(0)
No exclusive models — NVIDIA A100 80GB can run everything NVIDIA A100 40GB can.
Only NVIDIA A100 80GB can run(8)
Both run natively(51)
These models fit in VRAM on both GPUs. Bandwidth determines which runs them faster.
- Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct33.6 t/svs21.4 t/s
- Llama 3.3 70B Instruct34.4 t/svs22 t/s
- DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B34.4 t/svs22 t/s
- Llama 3.1 70B Instruct34.4 t/svs22 t/s
- Mixtral 8x7B Instruct v0.137.1 t/svs28.3 t/s
- Command-R 35B31.5 t/svs27.6 t/s
- Qwen 3.5 35B-A3B (MoE)120.6 t/svs122.7 t/s
- Qwen 3.6 35B32.7 t/svs33.7 t/s
- Yi 1.5 34B Chat33.4 t/svs34.4 t/s
- Qwen3 32B35.8 t/svs19.8 t/s
- Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct35.1 t/svs19.7 t/s
- Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct35.1 t/svs19.7 t/s
- DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B35.1 t/svs19.7 t/s
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B116.9 t/svs64.9 t/s
- Gemma 4 31B35.3 t/svs20.3 t/s
- Qwen3 30B-A3B (MoE)88.4 t/svs63.7 t/s
- +35 more on both
Which should you choose?
- • You need to run larger models (>40 GB VRAM)
- • Faster token generation is the priority
Frequently asked questions
- Which is better for local AI, the NVIDIA A100 40GB or NVIDIA A100 80GB?
- For local AI inference, the NVIDIA A100 80GB has the edge. It offers 80 GB VRAM (vs 40 GB) and 2039 GB/s bandwidth (vs 1555 GB/s), letting it run 59 models natively in VRAM vs 51 for its rival.
- How much VRAM does the NVIDIA A100 40GB have vs the NVIDIA A100 80GB?
- The NVIDIA A100 40GB has 40 GB of HBM2 at 1555 GB/s. The NVIDIA A100 80GB has 80 GB of HBM2e at 2039 GB/s. The NVIDIA A100 80GB has 40 GB more VRAM, allowing it to run 8 models the NVIDIA A100 40GB cannot fit natively.
- Can the NVIDIA A100 40GB run Llama 3.3 70B?
- Yes. The NVIDIA A100 40GB runs Llama 3.3 70B natively at Q2_K quantization at approximately 34.4 tokens per second.
- Can the NVIDIA A100 80GB run Llama 3.3 70B?
- Yes. The NVIDIA A100 80GB runs Llama 3.3 70B natively at Q6_K quantization at approximately 22 tokens per second.
- What is the difference between the NVIDIA A100 40GB and NVIDIA A100 80GB for AI?
- The key difference for AI inference is VRAM and memory bandwidth. The NVIDIA A100 40GB has 40 GB VRAM at 1555 GB/s (CUDA backend). The NVIDIA A100 80GB has 80 GB VRAM at 2039 GB/s (CUDA backend). VRAM determines which models fit; bandwidth determines tokens per second. The NVIDIA A100 40GB runs 51 models natively vs 59 for the NVIDIA A100 80GB.