GLM-5.2 753B vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T

Side-by-side VRAM requirements, benchmark scores, and GPU compatibility for local AI inference.

Quick verdict

GLM-5.2 753B is more hardware-efficient: it needs 515.1 GB at its Q4_K_M build vs 1091.4 GB for DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T's Q4_K_M, fitting on 2 GPUs natively.

VRAM at each quantization (8k context)

FP32
GLM-5.2 753B
3374.9 GB
DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T
7168.1 GB
BF16
GLM-5.2 753B
1688.2 GB
DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T
3584.1 GB
FP16
GLM-5.2 753B
1688.2 GB
DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T
3584.1 GB
Q8_0
GLM-5.2 753B
898.0 GB
DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T
1905.0 GB
Q6_K
GLM-5.2 753B
693.9 GB
DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T
1471.3 GB
Q5_K_M
GLM-5.2 753B
601.9 GB
DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T
1276.0 GB
Q4_K_M
GLM-5.2 753B
515.1 GB
DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T
1091.4 GB
Q3_K_M
GLM-5.2 753B
407.1 GB
DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T
862.1 GB
Q2_K
GLM-5.2 753B
322.8 GB
DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T
682.9 GB
NVFP4
GLM-5.2 753B
423.1 GB
DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T
896.1 GB
QuantGLM-5.2 753BDeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6TDiff
FP323374.9 GB7168.1 GB-53%
BF161688.2 GB3584.1 GB-53%
FP161688.2 GB3584.1 GB-53%
Q8_0898.0 GB1905.0 GB-53%
Q6_K693.9 GB1471.3 GB-53%
Q5_K_M601.9 GB1276.0 GB-53%
Q4_K_M515.1 GB1091.4 GB-53%
Q3_K_M407.1 GB862.1 GB-53%
Q2_K322.8 GB682.9 GB-53%
NVFP4423.1 GB896.1 GB-53%

Diff is GLM-5.2 753B relative to DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T. Green = lower VRAM (fits more GPUs).

Model specifications

SpecGLM-5.2 753BDeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T
OrgZ.aiDeepSeek
Parameters753B1600B
ArchitectureMoE (40B active)MoE (49B active)
Context1024k tokens1024k tokens
Modalitiestexttext, vision, video
LicenseMITMIT
CommercialYesYes
Released2026-06-132026-04-24
GPUs (native)2 / 1190 / 119

Benchmark scores

BenchmarkGLM-5.2 753BDeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T
MMLU-Pro80.687.5
GPQA Diamond91.290.1
SWE-bench Pro62.1N/A
Terminal-Bench 2.181.0N/A

Green = higher score (better). N/A = not yet available. ~ = inherited from a base model, not independently reported for that release itself.

GPUs that run only GLM-5.2 753B(2)

GPUs that run only DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T(0)

Every GPU that runs DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T also runs GLM-5.2 753B.

Which should you use?

Choose GLM-5.2 753B if:
  • You have limited VRAM: it's a smaller model needing 515.1 GB vs 1091.4 GB
  • You're running coding tasks
  • You need chain-of-thought reasoning
  • It's the newer release (2026-06-13 vs 2026-04-24); check the benchmark table above for what actually improved
Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T if:
  • You want maximum capability and have a 1092 GB+ GPU
  • Benchmark quality matters: scores 87.5 vs 80.6 on MMLU-Pro
  • You need vision/image understanding

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, GLM-5.2 753B or DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T?
GLM-5.2 753B has 753B parameters vs 1600B for DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T, so DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T is the larger model. GLM-5.2 753B is more hardware-efficient, needing 515.1 GB at its Q4_K_M build vs 1091.4 GB for DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T's Q4_K_M. GLM-5.2 753B runs on more GPUs natively (2 vs 0). On MMLU-Pro, DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T scores higher (87.5 vs 80.6).
How much VRAM does GLM-5.2 753B need vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T?
At 8k context, GLM-5.2 753B needs approximately 515.1 GB of VRAM at its Q4_K_M build, while DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T needs 1091.4 GB at its Q4_K_M build. At the largest build each ships, GLM-5.2 753B requires 1688.2 GB (FP16) vs 3584.1 GB (FP16) for DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T.
Can you run GLM-5.2 753B on the same GPUs as DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T?
These models have very different VRAM requirements, so they do not share the same compatible GPU set.
What is the difference between GLM-5.2 753B and DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T?
GLM-5.2 753B has 753B parameters (40B active, MoE) with a 1024k context window. DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T has 1600B parameters (49B active, MoE) with a 1024k context window.
Which model fits in 24 GB of VRAM, GLM-5.2 753B or DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T?
Neither fits in 24 GB: GLM-5.2 753B needs 515.1 GB at Q4_K_M and DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T needs 1091.4 GB at Q4_K_M. Both require a multi-GPU server with 1092 GB+ of combined VRAM.
Full GLM-5.2 753B page →Full DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T page →Check your hardware →