NVIDIA RTX 3090 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Side-by-side local AI comparison: VRAM, memory bandwidth, model compatibility, and estimated tokens per second across 94 open-weight models.

Quick verdict

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX wins for local AI inference. It has 3% more memory bandwidth, runs 52 models natively (vs 52), and exclusively fits 0 models the other cannot. Note: NVIDIA RTX 3090 uses CUDA while AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX uses ROCM; software ecosystem matters for your framework.

Analysis

The RTX 3090 and Radeon RX 7900 XTX share the exact same 24GB VRAM ceiling on two different vendors' silicon, which makes this one of the cleanest NVIDIA-vs-AMD comparisons on this site: neither card has an obvious capacity advantage over the other, so the real differences come down to a small bandwidth edge for AMD and a much larger ecosystem gap between CUDA and ROCm.

With identical 24GB budgets, this site's calculator fits the same 52 of the 94 tracked models natively on either card at 8k context. The RX 7900 XTX's 960 GB/s edges out the RTX 3090's 936 GB/s by 2.6%, and that shows up as a small, consistent speed edge for AMD on everything both cards fit: Llama 3.1 8B at Q4_K_M runs 104.9 tok/s on the RX 7900 XTX versus 102.3 tok/s on the RTX 3090, Qwen 3.6 27B at Q4_K_M runs 36.7 versus 35.8 tok/s, and Qwen3 32B at Q4_K_M, which needs CPU offload on both cards at that quant (23.88 GB against roughly 22.8 GB of usable VRAM), still runs 29.3 versus 28.5 tok/s. None of those gaps are decisive on their own, a couple of percent either way. The bigger difference is software: the RTX 3090 runs on CUDA, a mature target every major inference tool (llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM, TensorRT-LLM) has had years to optimize, while the RX 7900 XTX needs ROCm, which is Linux-only for GPU acceleration and requires a llama.cpp build compiled with ROCm support; Windows users fall back to the slower Vulkan backend instead. The RTX 3090 also keeps one option the RX 7900 XTX doesn't: a working NVLink bridge for pooling two cards into a 48GB address space, reaching 70B-class models the way this site's own RTX 3090 page shows in detail. AMD has no equivalent consumer bridge on RDNA 3, so a multi-GPU RX 7900 XTX setup for 70B-class models depends entirely on ROCm's own peer-to-peer and layer-split support, which is real but far less commonly documented for local inference than llama.cpp's NVIDIA-first multi-GPU tooling.

Bottom line: On raw hardware, this is close to a wash: AMD's small bandwidth edge buys a couple of percent more tokens per second on anything both cards fit, and both share the identical 24GB ceiling. The decision comes down to software maturity and what you plan to do beyond a single card: pick the RTX 3090 for the more mature CUDA ecosystem, broader tool support, and the option to pool two cards over NVLink for 70B-class models later. Pick the RX 7900 XTX if you're already committed to a Linux ROCm workflow, want the modest speed edge on single-card use, or can find it meaningfully cheaper than a comparable RTX 3090 on the used market.

Specs comparison

SpecNVIDIA RTX 3090AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
VRAM24 GB24 GB
Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
Bandwidth936 GB/s960 GB/s(+3%)
ArchitectureAmpereRDNA 3
BackendCUDAROCM
TierConsumerConsumer
Released20202022
Models (native)5252

Estimated tokens per second

Computed from memory bandwidth and model active-parameter weight. Assumes model fits natively in VRAM.

ModelNVIDIA RTX 3090AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTXDelta
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct(70B)N/AN/AN/A
Qwen 3.6 27B(27B)30.8 t/s(Q5_K_M)31.6 t/s(Q5_K_M)-3%
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct(8B)35.6 t/s(BF16)36.5 t/s(BF16)-2%
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct(7.6B)38.8 t/s(BF16)39.8 t/s(BF16)-3%

Delta is NVIDIA RTX 3090 relative to AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX.

Only NVIDIA RTX 3090 can run(0)

No exclusive models: AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX can run everything NVIDIA RTX 3090 can.

Only AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX can run(0)

No exclusive models: NVIDIA RTX 3090 can run everything AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX can.

Both run natively(52)

These models fit in VRAM on both GPUs. Bandwidth determines which runs them faster.

Which should you choose?

Choose NVIDIA RTX 3090 if:
  • • You rely on CUDA-based tools (PyTorch, vLLM, Ollama)
Choose AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX if:
  • • Faster token generation is the priority
  • • You want the newer architecture and longer driver support lifecycle

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for local AI, the NVIDIA RTX 3090 or AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX?
For local AI inference, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX has the edge. It offers 24 GB VRAM (vs 24 GB) and 960 GB/s bandwidth (vs 936 GB/s), letting it run 52 models natively in VRAM vs 52 for its rival.
How much VRAM does the NVIDIA RTX 3090 have vs the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX?
The NVIDIA RTX 3090 has 24 GB of GDDR6X at 936 GB/s. The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX has 24 GB of GDDR6 at 960 GB/s. Both GPUs have the same VRAM amount; bandwidth determines which generates tokens faster.
Can the NVIDIA RTX 3090 run Llama 3.3 70B?
The NVIDIA RTX 3090 can run Llama 3.3 70B with CPU offload at Q3_K_M, but at reduced speed.
Can the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX run Llama 3.3 70B?
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX can run Llama 3.3 70B with CPU offload at Q3_K_M, but at reduced speed.
What is the difference between the NVIDIA RTX 3090 and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX for AI?
The key difference for AI inference is VRAM and memory bandwidth. The NVIDIA RTX 3090 has 24 GB VRAM at 936 GB/s (CUDA backend). The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX has 24 GB VRAM at 960 GB/s (ROCM backend). VRAM determines which models fit; bandwidth determines tokens per second. The NVIDIA RTX 3090 runs 52 models natively vs 52 for the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX.
Full NVIDIA RTX 3090 page →Full AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX page →Check your hardware →