CanItRun Logocanitrun.

Aider vs Continue: Which AI Tool Is Right for Your Hardware?

Side-by-side comparison of local model support, GPU requirements, OpenRouter compatibility, pricing, and setup difficulty. Find which tool fits your workflow and hardware.

Aider

AI pair programming in your terminal. The most local-model-friendly coding agent with a tiny ~2K token system prompt and deep git integration.

Continue

Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains. Tab autocomplete, chat, and agent mode with separate models per role — like a local Copilot.

Feature comparison

FeatureAiderContinue
Typecoding agentcoding agent, developer tool
Open sourceYesYes
Pricingopen-sourceopen-source
Platformscli, macos, linuxvscode, jetbrains
Local modelsYesYes
OpenRouterYesYes
OllamaYesYes
GPU neededYesNo
CPU-onlyYesYes
Setupmediummedium

Which should you choose?

Choose Aider if

  • Pair programming with local models on modest hardware
  • Git-integrated workflows with auto-commit
  • Working with any editor (not just VS Code)

Choose Continue if

  • Copilot-like autocomplete with local models for privacy
  • Multi-model workflows (local autocomplete + cloud agent)
  • Teams wanting IDE integration without vendor lock-in

Hardware requirements

Aider

Aider is the most efficient coding agent for local models. Its ~2K system prompt means you can run 7B models on 8 GB VRAM and 14B models on 12-16 GB VRAM. Configure Ollama context window higher than the default 2K tokens.

Continue

8 GB VRAM for 7B autocomplete/chat models. 16 GB for 14B agent mode. Agent mode with local models requires explicit tool_use capability config.

Full compatibility details

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for local models: Aider or Continue?
Both Aider and Continue support local models via Ollama. The choice depends on your specific workflow and hardware.
Do I need a GPU for Aider vs Continue?
Aider: Aider is the most efficient coding agent for local models. Its ~2K system prompt means you can run 7B models on 8 GB VRAM and 14B models on 12-16 GB VRAM. Configure Ollama context window higher than the default 2K tokens. Continue: 8 GB VRAM for 7B autocomplete/chat models. 16 GB for 14B agent mode. Agent mode with local models requires explicit tool_use capability config.
Which is cheaper: Aider or Continue?
Both Aider (open-source) and Continue (open-source) have comparable pricing models.